2FAuth vs SuperTokens
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
2FAuth
Self-hosted web app to manage two-factor authentication codes
VS
SuperTokens
Open-source user authentication you can self-host
| Feature | 2FAuth | SuperTokens |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,090 | ★ 15,250 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Authy, Google Authenticator | Auth0, Firebase Auth |
Why pick each one
Choose 2FAuth if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is 2FAuth or SuperTokens better?
Neither is universally better. SuperTokens has the larger community, while 2FAuth is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are 2FAuth and SuperTokens free and open-source?
Yes. 2FAuth is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SuperTokens under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 2FAuth and SuperTokens with Docker?
2FAuth: yes. SuperTokens: yes.